He added that Russia doesn’t have a history of manufacturing Mistral-type ships and that “to catch up now would be pointless.” Our military equipment does not correspond to the demands of our age.” In an interview with the Izvestia newspaper on Monday, Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov acknowledged that Russia has “some need for foreign technology because, in certain areas of armament, we unfortunately lag behind. The Russians told journalists that their “interests in this area had been satisfied” and that Russia would receive the technology to produce the Mistral’s command-and-control system itself. Serious talks began in 2009 shortly after France rejoined NATO’s military network French President Charles de Gaulle had withdrawn the country’s forces from the alliance’s command in 1966.Ī sticking point in the negotiations had been France’s initial refusal to agree to the ships to be fitted with state-of-the-art command-and-control technology. The deal was struck after tortuous negotiations lasting 18 months between Paris and Moscow. A major attraction of the French bid was that it was free of American components, licenses or technology, Russian officials said. The French overcame competition from Spanish, Dutch and South Korean firms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |